Human telepathy lies hidden in its improbability and subtlety.
- amilgrom4
- Mar 8
- 2 min read
When I finally gathered all the experimental evidence that I needed to confirm the reality of natural and spontaneous human telepathy, my attention was drawn to the whys. Why does no one else perceive or acknowledge that human telepathy? Why is it never spoken of? Why the resistance?
My first conclusion is that human telepathy appears impossible because of the relational and communicative systems we have built for ourselves, in modern times. Apart from a few ancient and isolated indigenous peoples, our societies have relied exclusively on the use of verbal language for the past several decades. Whether oral or written, human communication is fundamentally based on words and sentences. Through education systems, cultural and religious conditioning, and a pervasive fear of anything deemed un-scientific, we have dismissed the possibility of alternative modes of transmission. The sacred reign of words has imposed its power.
Texts, alphabets, syntax, vocabulary, are now the only tools we use to describe and frame our reality, emotions and experiences. We do accept some art forms – danse, singing, painting, etc. - as expressions of life, but not as a means of communication between two or more individuals.
Because of the omnipresence and omnipotence of words, our brains simply refuse to entertain the possibility (and the richness!) of connecting through other signals such as thoughts, ideas or energies. That aspect of our natural ability has been switched off. The existence of information fields that surround all bodies, plants and objects seem more a matter for quantum physics than for any other discipline. The fact that these fields merge when two individuals interact appears outright insane.
The second reason telepathy remains hidden in plain sight lies in its subtlety. Its signal is low-key, soft, and receptive. For our nervous systems that are constantly bombarded by the ceaseless static of modern life, such signal is virtually impossible to perceive. Our minds and bodies now crave for sensationalism, for volume, for intensity. Too bad: telepathy is just the opposite. It is modest, humble, and discreet. We must learn to be observant if we are to welcome its magic. We must cease the urge to have something to say or to prove, to be able to witness its widespread existence.
Perhaps these very qualities serve a purpose: to keep telepathy concealed, until we, as a species, are ready to embrace this natural and vibrant mode of communication.
Comments